bg_wrapper

January 23, 2025

Dealing with Earnout Disputes: Legal Avenues and Best Practices

Hero Image

Imagine you’ve closed a deal to sell your small business, only to discover months later that your promised future payments—often called “earnouts”—have become the source of a heated dispute. Perhaps revenue targets are allegedly missed, or the buyer claims operational costs have skyrocketed, slashing the payout you expected. These scenarios, known as earnout disputes, can unravel what started as a promising acquisition and leave you at odds with the new owners of your former company.

In this article, we’ll examine why small business owners frequently face difficulties with earnout arrangements and how to address them. We’ll cover the essential legal frameworks, best practices to resolve disputes, and concrete steps you can take to protect your interests. You’ll walk away with a clear picture of how earnouts work, the most common pitfalls, and strategies to keep the peace—and the payout—intact.


Understanding Earnout Disputes

An earnout is a payment structure in which a portion of the sale price for a business is contingent on the company achieving agreed-upon performance metrics after the sale. While these metrics often revolve around revenue targets or profit thresholds, they can also be tied to specific milestones like new product launches or customer retention rates. Earnouts appeal to both buyers and sellers:

  • Sellers see an opportunity to secure a higher overall price if the company performs well.

  • Buyers gain assurance they aren’t overpaying for a business whose financial prospects remain unproven.

Yet the key word is “if.” If those metrics aren’t met—or if there’s disagreement on how to measure them—conflicts can arise. These conflicts are what we call “earnout disputes,” often involving one or more of these issues:

  • Misaligned performance metrics or ambiguous calculation methods.

  • Differing interpretations of financial statements.

  • Allegations of mismanagement or operational changes post-sale.

  • Failure to follow agreed-upon procedures, such as consulting the seller on major decisions.

How Earnouts Are Structured

Typically, earnout agreements specify:

Provision

Description

Performance Metric

The specific target(s) the company needs to hit (e.g., revenue, EBITDA, customer counts).

Measurement Period

How long the metric is tracked (often 1–3 years post-acquisition).

Calculation Method

Detailed formula indicating how to compute the metric (e.g., GAAP-based net income).

Payment Schedule

When and how earnout payments are made (e.g., lump sum vs. installments).

Buyer Obligations

Duties the buyer must uphold (e.g., maintaining a certain marketing budget).

Seller Protections

Clauses requiring the buyer to act in good faith or consult prior to major decisions.

When these provisions are adequately defined and implemented in good faith, both parties can benefit. But if these terms are vague or the buyer’s actions post-acquisition diverge from the seller’s expectations, earnout disagreements become likely.

Why Earnout Disputes Arise

Earnouts are ripe for conflict because they involve a period where both parties still have skin in the game:

  • The buyer may aim to minimize operational costs or shift strategy, impacting the metrics that trigger earnout payments.

  • The seller may notice “unfair” changes that reduce the potential payout.

  • External factors like market downturns can make hitting revenue targets more difficult, creating tension about whether business outcomes are truly avoidable or the result of new management decisions.

In extreme cases, trust breaks down completely, resulting in post-closing disputes that transform a once-friendly sale into a stressful legal battle.


When an earnout dispute arises, you have several options for resolution. The exact path you choose often depends on the contract terms, the severity of the dispute, and your willingness to invest time and money in a formal legal process. Below, we’ll examine some common legal avenues.

1. Negotiation

Often the first—and simplest—route involves direct negotiations. You and the buyer sit down (in-person or virtually) and discuss each other’s concerns, aiming to reach a compromise. Successful negotiations can:

  • Clarify ambiguous contractual language.

  • Resolve minor misunderstandings about calculation methods.

  • Establish new guidelines for operational decision-making.

This approach can preserve business relationships and minimize legal costs. However, if the parties are too far apart in their interpretations or there’s a lack of good faith, negotiations may fail.

2. Mediation

Mediation is generally less formal than litigation and involves a neutral third party, the mediator, who facilitates productive discussions. This process encourages:

  • Open communication without the fear of courtroom repercussions.

  • Creative solutions that might go beyond strict contractual interpretation.

  • Preservation of goodwill, which can be critical if future interactions or collaborations are needed.

Mediation sessions often reveal each side’s underlying interests. For example, maybe the buyer is genuinely concerned about capital spending levels, while the seller primarily wants clarity on how marketing budgets are allocated. If resolved properly, both sides can explore a middle ground that wasn’t apparent before mediation.

3. Arbitration

Arbitration is a more formal approach than mediation, but still typically takes place outside of the court system. Many earnout agreements include an arbitration clause, which dictates:

  • Who will serve as the arbitrator or how the arbitrator is chosen.

  • What procedural rules govern the arbitration process.

  • Whether the arbitrator’s decision is binding and enforceable in court.

Arbitration can be faster and more private than litigation, which appeals to those wanting a swift, less public resolution. However, arbitration rulings are usually binding, offering limited grounds for appeal if you disagree with the outcome.

4. Litigation

If all else fails, you can file a lawsuit. Litigation is the most formal and often the most expensive route for resolving an earnout dispute. It involves:

  • A complaint filed in civil court.

  • Potential discovery of documents, depositions, and expert testimonies on financial metrics.

  • A trial where a judge or jury decides if the alleged contract breach occurred.

Litigation can be lengthy, draining resources and straining morale. Yet in cases of significant fraud or blatant contractual violations, going to court might be necessary to safeguard your financial interests.


Best Practices for Avoiding Earnout Disputes

The best time to manage earnout disputes is before they arise. By structuring your earnout carefully and documenting every term, you minimize ambiguity and reduce the risk of a post-closing fight. Below are practical steps to plan and protect yourself effectively.

Clarify Every Term

Earnouts live or die in the details. Vague language about “reasonable” expenses or “standard” accounting principles can translate into big disagreements. Aim to define:

  • The exact performance metrics.

  • Clear formulas for calculating those metrics, including any add-backs or exclusions.

  • Specific guidelines for operational decisions that could affect performance (marketing budgets, hiring choices, major capital expenditures).

  • Precisely how and when disputes are escalated, and which arbitration or mediation forum applies.

Set Communication Protocols

Both sides should agree on a process for monitoring performance and discussing any concerns. This includes:

  • A schedule for exchanging financial data.

  • Who prepares the financial statements and whether the seller has the right to review the underlying bookkeeping.

  • Mandatory meetings or check-ins to discuss significant decisions that might impact the earnout.

Open lines of communication prevent small misunderstandings from snowballing into larger conflicts.

Include Seller Protections

Because buyers control day-to-day operations post-acquisition, sellers are often at a disadvantage when earnout metrics rely on how the business is run. Common seller protections can include:

  • A covenant requiring the buyer to operate the business in a manner consistent with past practices.

  • A requirement that the buyer not cut or drastically shift marketing, R&D, or other key areas that support hitting performance targets.

  • Rights for the seller to be consulted before making major changes that could materially impact earnout metrics.

These clauses don’t mean the buyer can never deviate from past strategies. Instead, they ensure modifications are done transparently and with the seller’s potential payout in mind.

Build in Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

Specify in the contract what steps each party must take before escalating to arbitration or litigation. For instance:

  1. Written notice of the dispute, followed by a mandatory negotiation period (e.g., 30 days).

  2. If unresolved, proceed to mediation with an agreed-upon mediator.

  3. If mediation fails, mandatory binding arbitration under defined rules.

This tiered approach encourages resolution at each step before resorting to a courtroom battle. It can save thousands of dollars in legal fees and months of productivity.

Keep Meticulous Records

Whether you’re the seller or the buyer, maintaining detailed financial and operational records can help you avoid or win earnout disputes later. Key documents include:

  • Monthly or quarterly P&L statements.

  • Invoices and receipts for major expenditures.

  • Correspondence or meeting minutes on strategic decisions (e.g., initiating a new marketing campaign).

  • Audited or reviewed statements from a reputable accounting firm.

Accurate and comprehensive records allow you to demonstrate whether conditions for payout were met or if certain buyer actions deviated from the earnout agreement.


Real-World Earnout Dispute Example

To illustrate how these principles apply in practice, let’s look at a simplified example:

Scenario A

Scenario B

Type of Business

Small tech consulting firm acquired for $2M upfront + $1M earnout

Same financial metrics, same earnout structure

Agreed Earnout Terms

• 2-year earnout based on net income ≥ $300k/year • Buyer must maintain current staffing levels; any headcount cuts must be approved by Seller

• 2-year earnout based on net income ≥ $300k/year • Vague clause about “appropriate staffing”

Buyer Actions

Maintains staff, invests in marketing, consults Seller on strategic pivots

Reassigns key consultants to unrelated business units, drastically reducing net income

Seller’s Outcome

Earnout is fully met — Seller receives the extra $1M. Dispute is avoided.

Seller claims buyer sabotaged net income so they wouldn’t have to pay earnout. Litigation ensues.

Resolution

No dispute arises. Smooth post-sale transition.

Court determines buyer must pay partial earnout. Both sides spend $$$ on legal fees.

Why the difference? In Scenario A, the earnout clause was specific about staffing, so the buyer was contractually obligated to keep headcount stable or get the seller’s consent for changes. This clarity minimized disagreements. Conversely, Scenario B’s vague “appropriate staffing” language left room for drastically different interpretations, setting the stage for conflict.


A Step-by-Step Process for Managing Earnout Arrangements

Below is a concise process to help protect yourself from future earnout disputes. While every deal has unique aspects, these steps can serve as a helpful guide:

  1. Determine Viability of an Earnout

    • Evaluate if an earnout is truly suitable given your business model and potential risk factors.

    • Use industry data or professional guidance to set realistic performance metrics.

  2. Draft a Clear Agreement

    • Specify formulas, measurement periods, and particular operational protections.

    • Include a blueprint for how disputes will be handled.

  3. Negotiate Good Faith Provisions

    • Clarify each party’s responsibilities, especially around major decisions like cost-cutting or asset disposition.

    • Seek “red flag” triggers that, if met, prompt immediate communication.

  4. Set Post-Sale Communication Cadences

    • Arrange periodic check-ins to review financials and discuss any operational shifts.

    • Document each meeting, summarizing proposed changes and anticipated outcomes.

  5. Keep Rigorous Documentation

    • Store detailed records of P&L statements, cost allocations, and relevant communications.

    • If your agreement allows, periodically verify that the buyer’s accounting practices align with the terms.

  6. Address Discrepancies Early

    • If you notice potential shortfalls or questionable decisions, bring them up promptly.

    • If direct communication fails, consider mediation before the issue escalates.

  7. Escalate to Formal Dispute Resolution

    • Follow the prescribed mediation/arbitration route in your agreement.

    • In worst-case scenarios, prepare for litigation, but weigh the costs and benefits carefully.


Additional Considerations for Small Business Owners

Small business owners frequently sell to larger entities that may have greater legal budgets and more resources for protracted disputes. Here are key considerations to ensure you remain on strong footing:

  • Consult an Experienced AttorneyAn attorney who specializes in M&A (mergers and acquisitions) can identify potential loopholes or ambiguous terms before you sign. They can also advise on the feasibility of certain protections, such as requiring the buyer to maintain your brand identity or pricing structures.

  • Request a Strong Dispute Resolution ClauseEnsure the contract explicitly identifies steps for dispute resolution, from friendly discussions through to arbitration or litigation. Avoid vague language like “may agree to mediate,” which offers no guarantee the other side will cooperate.

  • Plan for Changes in Economic ConditionsSome deal structures include “earnout baskets” or “kickers,” which adjust targets if the economy suffers. This ensures that if external factors beyond the buyer’s control hamper revenue, the seller doesn’t automatically lose their earnout.

  • Understand the Buyer’s Track RecordIf the buyer has a history of earnout disagreements, that’s a warning sign. Don’t be afraid to ask for references or to inquire about how previous earnouts were handled.


Conclusion: Protecting Your Interests and Avoiding Earnout Display Conflict

Earnout arrangements can be a win-win for both buyers and sellers—if well-designed and executed in good faith. By taking the time to spell out explicit terms, instituting robust dispute resolution procedures, and maintaining open communication, you dramatically reduce the chance of post-closing disputes. Clear protections in your contract illuminate the path for how the buyer should run the business and how you’ll stay informed, bolstering your peace of mind.

Key Takeaways:

  • Detailed Contracts: Leave little room for interpretation by being precise about metrics, formulas, and allowable operational changes.

  • Early Dispute Prevention: Communicate frequently and transparently to resolve issues before they escalate.

  • Legal Recourse: Understand and negotiate the dispute resolution clauses best suited to small business owners, whether that’s mediation, arbitration, or litigation.

  • Professional Guidance: An M&A-savvy attorney can flag hidden risks and help draft robust clauses that protect your earnout.

Next Steps

If you’re exploring a sale of your small business with an earnout component—or if you’re already navigating a tricky earnout dispute—our team is here to help. We offer strategic guidance tailored to the unique dynamics of small business transactions. Contact us for:

  • A preliminary review of your earnout agreement to pinpoint vulnerabilities.

  • Tailored negotiation strategies for settlement or mediation.

  • Expert referrals for formal dispute resolution, including arbitration and litigation.

Schedule a confidential consultation with OffDeal M&A—a conversation could save you time and money while preserving the value you deserve from your business sale.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. Always consult qualified professionals regarding your specific situation.

Preview potential buyers, for free

OffDeal leverages advanced technology and expertise to help small business owners achieve the same quality of M&A service previously reserved for large corporations. Our mission is to ensure every business owner has the opportunity to maximize their value when they're ready to sell.